As the WNBA season heats up, Angel Reese’s impressive box score numbers have sparked a debate about the emphasis on individual statistics versus team-oriented play.

Reese’s double-double streaks have drawn attention, but the reality is that her game is not as strong as her statistics suggest. Her issues with short-range shooting and rebounding tactics have raised doubts about the authenticity of her numbers.

More clearly, she rebounds her multiple and habitual failures. Something too notorious and more, when players like A’ja Wilson (averaging 20.5 points and 9.5 rebounds per game) and Caitlin Clark (averaging 25.5 points and 7.5 assists per game) have demonstrated a more complete approach, prioritizing substance over statistics, exposing what is really wrong in the current sport: the narratives and macabre interests of those who promote them and hide behind dark interests evidently foreign to the sport.

That said, the two of them (A’ja and Caitlin) exemplify a style of play that balances individual achievements with teamwork and solid fundamentals. While Reese’s contributions should be evaluated within the context of her team, the comparison with Wilson and Clark is absurd and highlights the importance of considering both statistics and substance when evaluating a player’s value.

In summary, the debate raises important questions about the direction of the WNBA and the true meaning of success in basketball. The male included. Lately, there has been an inexplicable eagerness on social media to make LeBron James something bigger than he really is.